Payroll Insights -- Please open to view this e-newsletter from KPMG LLP.
FEEDBACK

April 2007

An Update on Payroll and Employment Tax Topics

About This Newsletter

Payroll Insights is a publication from KPMG LLP’s Employment Tax Practice. It is designed to provide you with current developments in the payroll and employment tax arena and will be published periodically throughout the year as developments warrant.

In This Issue

 

Reminder: IRS Regulations on Income Tax Withholding on Supplemental Wages Effective for Payments Made On or After January 1, 2007

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA) changed the way employers withhold federal income tax on supplemental wages (e.g., bonuses, commissions, etc.). The optional flat rate for withholding on supplemental wages is generally 25 percent on amounts up to $1 million. Under the AJCA, supplemental compensation amounts paid in the aggregate in excess of $1 million during a calendar year are subject to mandatory income tax withholding at the highest income tax rate (currently 35 percent).

In July 2006, the Internal Revenue Service issued final regulations implementing the AJCA withholding provisions (71 Fed. Reg. 42049) that are effective for wages paid on or after January 1, 2007. The regulations address several issues:

Definitions of Regular Wages and Supplemental Wages

Supplemental wages include any wages paid by an employer that are not regular wages. Regular wages are amounts paid by an employer for a payroll period either at a regular hourly rate or in a predetermined, fixed amount. Supplemental wages are wages that vary from payroll period to payroll period based on factors other than the amount of time worked (such as commissions, tips, and bonuses). Under the regulations, payments that satisfy the basic definition of supplemental wages are considered to be supplemental wages, even if the employee has not received any regular wages in his or her working career with the employer. This last sentence represents a change in the rules, effective January 1, 2007, but it is not as much of a change as tax practitioners had hoped for. Although the amounts are now always called "supplemental wages," if the employee has not received regular compensation for the year of payment or the prior calendar year, the employer still cannot use the supplemental withholding rates for ad hoc supplemental payments made to former employees (see the optional flat rate discussion below).

The regulations provide guidance and examples regarding the proper classification of certain types of payments as regular or supplemental wages, and options for the treatment of certain payments to simplify employers’ compliance with the requirement that they separately track the payment of supplemental wages prior to reaching the threshold for mandatory flat rate withholding.

Employers may treat tips and/or overtime pay as regular wages, and they are not required to apply the treatment of tips and overtime pay uniformly to all employees of the employer. Employers must treat commissions, third-party sick pay paid by agents of the employer, or taxable fringe benefits as supplemental wages.

Procedures for Withholding on Supplemental Wages of $1 Million
or Less

If an employee has not received cumulatively more than $1 million of supplemental wages during the calendar year, there are generally two procedures available for withholding: (1) the aggregate procedure, under which employers calculate the amount of withholding due by aggregating the amount of supplemental wages with the regular wages paid for the current payroll period or for the most recent payroll period of the year of the payment, and treating the aggregate as if it were a single payment for the regular payroll period; or (2) the optional flat rate procedure, under which the employers can disregard the amount of regular wages paid to an employee as well as the withholding allowances claimed by an employee on Form W-4 and use a flat percentage rate (specified in the regulations) to calculate the amount of withholding.

The optional flat rate procedure is available only if the employer has withheld income tax from regular wages paid to the employee, and the supplemental wages are either not paid concurrently with regular wages or are separately stated on the payroll records of the employer. One change from prior years is that optional flat rate withholding is available if the employer has withheld income tax from regular wages in the current year or the prior calendar year. Since most supplemental payments are made while the employee is still working or within a year after termination, this should support the use of supplemental withholding rates for many payments to former employees. However, a stock option exercise made two years after an individual retires may not satisfy this rule and thus the regulations provide that the optional flat rate is not available, even though the stock option is labeled as a "supplemental wage."

Procedures for Withholding on Supplemental Wages in Excess of $1 Million Paid to One Employee in a Calendar Year

The regulations provide that if the sum of supplemental wage payments and all other supplemental wage payments paid by an employer to an employee during the calendar year exceeds $1 million, the withholding rate on the amounts in excess of $1 million will be equal to the maximum tax rate for that year (currently 35 percent).

Applicability of Mandatory Flat Rate Withholding

In the interest of making the rules administrable for employers, the regulations provide that employers can treat amounts included in Box 1 of Form W-2, "wages, tips, and other compensation," as supplemental wages in determining whether an employee has received $1 million of supplemental wages.

Mandatory flat rate withholding applies only to the excess of supplemental wages over $1 million received by an employee from an employer, taking into consideration all payments of supplemental wages made by an employer to an employee. Thus, the mandatory flat rate withholding on supplemental wages in excess of $1 million can apply to all of a payment or to only a portion of the payment. The treatment may be applied on an employee-by-employee basis.

Compensation payments that are not defined as "wages subject to income tax withholding" are therefore not treated as "regular" or "supplemental" payments and do not count toward the $1 million limit. For example, disqualifying dispositions of ISOs are not subject to wage withholding (though they are reported as compensation for the year). Likewise, salary deferral payments do not count toward the limit.

In determining the amount of supplemental wages paid, salary deferral amounts are allocated to the gross regular wage payments or to the gross supplemental wage payments from which they are actually deducted. Thus, under an example in the preamble to the regulations, Employee has an automatic nonqualified deferred compensation salary deferral election in place to withhold 10 percent of compensation from salary and from bonuses. Employee is paid $1.5 million of regular salary and a $1 million bonus. Ten percent of the salary and bonus are automatically deferred into the plan. Employee is counted as having $150,000 of regular wages withheld and $100,000 of bonus compensation withheld. Thus, Employee has only $900,000 of supplemental wages.

Payments by Agents of Employers in Determining Applicability of Mandatory Flat Rate Withholding

Payments made by agents of the employer must be considered in determining the applicability of mandatory flat rate withholding. However, the regulations include a de minimis rule exception that is optional for both employers and agents. An agent making total wage payments, including regular and supplemental wages of less than $100,000 to an individual in any calendar year, may disregard other supplemental wages from the common law employer or any other agent of the employer that would subject the employee to mandatory flat rate withholding.

If an agent reaches the $100,000 threshold of wages paid to a single employee in a calendar year, then the employer must take into account all supplemental wages paid by the agent in determining whether mandatory flat rate withholding applies to a wage payment made after the agent reaches the $100,000 threshold. With the payment that reaches the $100,000 threshold, the agent who has made the $100,000 of wage payments to an employee during a calendar year is required to take into account all wages paid by the employer and any other agent of the employer who has reached the $100,000 threshold in determining the applicability of mandatory flat rate withholding.

This de minimis rule does not apply to the employer in situations where the employer has created arrangement(s) with five or more agents if a principal effect of the arrangements is to reduce applicable mandatory flat rate withholding for an employee. An employer may take into account all supplemental wages paid by agents, regardless of how small the payments are from any particular agent.

TOP  Top
 

Electronic Federal Tax Payment System State Pilot Program Begins with Illinois; South Carolina to Follow

The Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS) has launched a pilot program under which Illinois business taxpayers may pay state withholding and federal taxes at the same time through a single system.

EFTPS was developed by the Internal Revenue Service as a free service that allows individuals, small-business owners, and tax preparers to pay all federal taxes (e.g., income, employment, excise, and Form 1040 quarterly estimated tax payments) electronically. According to the IRS, most small businesses pay federal withholding taxes by check and Federal Tax Deposit (FTD) coupons. Illinois ranks fifth in FTD coupon usage.

The goal of the pilot program is to encourage more taxpayers to enroll in and use EFTPS by making it available for paying both state withholding and federal taxes. Illinois is evaluating whether EFTPS will improve the efficiency of its tax collection system.

EFTPS generally offers a variety of payment methods, such as online payments, telephone voice response, and desktop software. Under the first phase of the pilot program, Illinois taxpayers will be able to make online payments, and can access the system using a single taxpayer identification number (TIN), personal identification number (PIN) and password combination to make both federal and state payments. The pilot will also allow taxpayers to view their complete payment history and cancel payments using just one enrollment. Illinois and South Carolina will participate in subsequent phases of the pilot, which will include the use of "batch provider" software (used by tax professionals) and "bulk provider" software (used by payroll service companies).

Results of the pilot program will be used to help the U.S. Department of Treasury determine whether to expand this service to other states and to include additional types of state taxes for payment through EFTPS.

TOP  Top
 

Guidance Revises Earlier IRS Position on When Accrual-Basis Taxpayers Can Treat Payroll Tax Liability as Incurred for Deferred Compensation

In Rev. Rul. 2007-12, the IRS addresses the issue of whether an accrual method taxpayer can treat its FICA and FUTA tax liability as incurred in Year 1 if the compensation to which the tax liability relates is deferred compensation that is deductible under section 404 (regarding deductibility for employer contributions to an employee benefit plan) in Year 2, if the all-events test and recurring item exemption of section 461 (regarding the taxable year of deduction) are otherwise met.

Facts

  • Corporation X uses an accrual method of accounting and is a calendar year taxpayer.
  • As of the end of Year 1, (1) Corporation X has a fixed liability to pay compensation for services provided by its employees during Year 1; and (2) all events have occurred to establish that Corporation X’s liability for the payroll taxes owed under sections 3111 (employer’s share of FICA) and 3301 (FUTA taxes) related to the compensation and the amount of payroll tax liability can be determined with reasonable accuracy.
  • Corporation X properly adopted the recurring item exception under Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.461-5 as a method of accounting for payroll taxes.
  • Corporation X pays the payroll taxes either in Year 1, or before the earlier of September 15 of Year 2 or the date Corporation X timely files its federal tax return for Year 1 (including extensions).
  • Under section 461, payroll taxes generally would be treated as incurred by Corporation X in Year 1.
  • The compensation to which the payroll taxes relate is deferred compensation that is properly deductible in Year 2.

Ruling

The IRS ruled that if the all-events test and the recurring item exemption under section 461 are otherwise met, an accrual basis taxpayer may treat its payroll tax liability as incurred in Year 1 — regardless of whether the compensation to which the liability relates is deferred compensation that is deductible under section 404 in Year 2.

In the ruling, the IRS explained that section 404 applies to compensation paid or accrued by an employer on account of any employee under a deferred compensation plan. In addition, an employer’s liability for payroll taxes does not represent compensation paid or accrued by an employer. Thus, the IRS found that section 404 does not control the deductibility of an employer’s liability for payroll taxes — even if the payroll tax liability relates to a deferred compensation liability that is subject to section 404’s deduction rules.

Effect on Employers

The facts and circumstances of each situation should be examined to determine whether the underlying liability is fixed under the all-events test. Previously, the IRS has allowed method changes involving this issue for payroll taxes only on compensation paid within two and one-half months (rather than eight and one-half months) of a taxpayer’s year-end. The ruling indicates that a change in treatment of payroll taxes to comply with this ruling would be a change in accounting method under sections 446 and 481. Employers wishing to make such a change must obtain advance consent from the IRS as described in Rev. Proc. 97-21. (The IRS did not issue a companion revenue procedure allowing for an automatic change of accounting to comply with the ruling.)

TOP  Top
 

Multi-State Withholding Update

CT Dept. of Revenue Issues Policy Statement on Withholding for Athletes and Entertainers

In a recent policy statement (PS 2007(1)), the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services (DRS) describes the requirements for income tax withholding for payments made to performers or performing entities on income derived from Connecticut sources.

Under Connecticut law, designated withholding agents must withhold Connecticut income tax from a payment for personal services made to an athlete or entertainer (or such individual’s agent) who is not considered an employee of the withholding agent for federal income tax purposes. For Connecticut income tax withholding purposes, the athlete or entertainer is treated as an employee and the designated withholding agent is treated as the employer. Thus, the designated withholding agent must: (1) register with the DRS to withhold Connecticut income tax, (2) withhold Connecticut income tax from the payment made to the athlete or entertainer (or agent), and (3) pay over the Connecticut income tax and file the Connecticut withholding tax returns with DRS. There are some exceptions to the withholding requirement, including a de minimis payment amount that would not be subject to withholding, special rules for certain educational institution activities, and the opportunity for reduced or waived withholding, upon application to the DRS.

The policy statement provides definitions of significant terms, such as performer, which is defined as an athlete (a term that also includes referees and trainers), and entertainer (which also includes writers, directors, members of sound and light crews, and certain public speakers).

The policy statement also sets forth changes to dates on which designated withholding agents must pay over Connecticut income tax withholding. Each designated withholding agent must withhold Connecticut income tax from nonpayroll amounts at the time those amounts were paid, and is required to pay over such withholding to DRS on or before established due dates, based on whether the designated withholding agent remits on a weekly, monthly, or quarterly basis. The designated withholding agent’s frequency of remittance is based on its reported liability for Connecticut income tax withholding during the look-back calendar year. DRS will notify most designated withholding agents of their classification before mailing them remittance coupon books.

The guidance is effective for payments made by designated withholding agents to athletes or entertainers on or after January 1, 2007.

TOP  Top

Contact Us

Our area leaders in the Employment Tax Practice are interested in your feedback, including any topics you might like to see addressed in future issues.

Scott Schapiro

Principal
Tysons Corner, Virginia
703-286-8267
sschapiro@kpmg.com

Michael Svoboda

Principal
Los Angeles, California
213-955-8861
mjsvoboda@kpmg.com

Subscribe to Payroll Insights

If you aren't already a subscriber, click here to send an e-mail request to us to be added to our mailing list.

 

ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY KPMG TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability to specific situations is to be determined through consultation with your tax advisor.

 
 

To unsubscribe, please click here to send a message to us with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line and hit the SEND button.

Payroll Insights, KPMG LLP, 530 Chestnut Ridge Road, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677

© 2007 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.

KPMG Online Privacy Statement and Disclaimer