Payroll Insights -- Please open to view this e-newsletter from KPMG LLP.
FEEDBACK

September 2007

An Update on Payroll and Employment Tax Topics

About This Newsletter

Payroll Insights is a publication from KPMG LLP’s Employment Tax Practice. It is designed to provide you with current developments in the payroll and employment tax arena and will be published periodically throughout the year as developments warrant.

In This Issue

 

IRS Issues Final Withholding Regulations; Removes Temporary Regulations

In final regulations, the IRS provides guidance under section 3402(f) relating to Form W-4, “Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate.” The regulations contain rules for income tax withholding when the IRS notifies the employer and employee of the maximum number of withholding exemptions permitted. The regulations also provide rules for the use of substitute forms and preserve the IRS’s ability to require the submission of certain copies of withholding exemption certificates. The regulations are effective as of July 13, 2007.

Temporary regulations issued in April 2005 modified the IRS’s procedures for submitting copies of Form W-4. Specifically, employers were no longer required to submit Form W-4 containing more than 10 withholding exemptions. In addition, the temporary regulations provided that employers did not have to routinely submit a Form W-4 on which an employee claimed complete exemption from withholding if the employer reasonably expected that the employee’s wages from that employer would usually be $200 or more per week. Instead, employers would only be required to submit Form W-4 if instructed to do so in published guidance or in a written notice to the employer from the IRS.

Most provisions of the temporary regulations remain unchanged in the final regulations, but the IRS made a few clarifications and modifications. The IRS clarified that if an employer receives a notice specifying the maximum number of withholding exemptions when withholding exclusions apply, merely receiving the notice does not impose a requirement to withhold where one does not already exist. The regulations also clarify that employers may meet the requirement of furnishing the notice to an employee within 10 business days using any reasonable business practice. Thus, the notice can be furnished using a secure and reliable electronic means of communication.

The final regulations modify the proposed regulations to clarify appropriate procedures when a notice applies to terminated, rehired and seasonal employees. The regulations clarify that the determination of whether the employee is employed is made as of the date of the notice, and is based on all the facts and circumstances – including whether the employer has treated the employment relationship as terminated for other purposes. Further, an employee who is not currently performing services is considered employed for purposes of this rule, if on the date of the notice:

  • The employer pays wages subject to income tax withholding with respect to prior employment on or after the date in the notice;
  • The employer reasonably expects the employee to resume the performance of services for the employer within 12 months of date of the notice, or
  • The employee is on a bona fide leave of absence not exceeding 12 months or if the individual retains the right to reemployment with the employer by contract or under applicable statute (e.g., the Family and Medical Leave Act).

An employer must withhold based on the notice unless:

  • The employer receives a modification notice,
  • The employee has provided or provides a new Form W-4 that results in more withholding than would result based on the notice,
  • The employer is required to furnish the notice only because the employer reasonably expects the employee to resume the performance of services within 12 months of the date of the notice, but the employee does not resume the performance of services until after such time, or
  • The employment relationship was terminated for more than 12 months.

The final regulations state that employers may not accept a substitute Form W-4 developed by an employee, and the employee submitting such a form will be treated as failing to furnish a withholding exemption certificate.

The final regulations are generally applicable as of April 14, 2005 (the date of the temporary regulations). The clarifications and modifications listed above apply on October 11, 2007, but employers may rely on those provisions for notices issued prior to that date.

TOP  Top
 

Federal Appropriations Bill Report Addresses Worker Misclassification

When the Senate Appropriations Committee approved the committee report (H. Rept. No. 110-129) to the House government appropriations bill (H.R. 2829), it included language expressing concern with the misclassification of workers as independent contractors. Noting that misclassification leads to underreporting and underpayment of employment and payroll taxes – a large part of the tax gap - the senators urged the IRS to provide increased tax enforcement in industries where misclassification is widespread. The House Appropriations Committee’s report (H. Rept. No. 110-207) on the same bill does not contain language about worker misclassification.

TOP  Top
 

Modified Mobile Workforce State Income Tax Fairness Simplification Act Introduced

H.R. 3359, sponsored by Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA) and Sen. Chris Cannon (R-UT), would limit state or local taxation of the compensation of any employee who performs duties in more than one state or locality to (1) the state or locality of the employee’s residence; and (2) the state or locality in which the employee is physically present performing duties for more than 60 days. Wages or other remuneration paid during any calendar year would not be subject to state or locality income tax withholding and reporting unless the employee is subject to the provisions above.

The legislation essentially mirrors a similar bill introduced during the last Congress. However, H.R. 3359 adds a provision specifying that if an employer maintains a time and attendance system for tracking where employees perform their duties, data from that system can be used instead of data provided by the employees. The bill includes new provisions defining “time and attendance system” for this purpose. The legislation’s definition of “employee” includes an exception for “certain public figures” (in addition to “professional athletes” and “entertainers", which were excepted from the definition under the prior legislation), and provides definitions for all three terms.

TOP  Top
 

PLR Defines Gross Income for Purposes of Leave Donation Programs

In a Private Letter Ruling (PLR) reviewing a taxpayer’s current leave donation program and proposed modifications to that program, the IRS examined whether donor and recipient employees are subject to section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code and its related withholding rules, or whether they meet certain exceptions affecting income and employment tax withholding (PLR 200720017).

The Taxpayer requesting the ruling has various programs and policies under which employees accrue paid leave that can be used for a variety of reasons, including vacation, personal days, and sick days. Leave must be approved by the Taxpayer, and is available only to the extent an employee has accrued the hours.

Under one policy, donor employees are allowed to surrender accrued hours of paid leave to recipient employees who lack sufficient hours of paid leave time to meet certain needs. After meeting certain eligibility requirements, an employee may submit a written request and authorization to request leave under the policy for a medical emergency (as defined in the policy), to care for a spouse or child in the event of a medical emergency, or for extended leave following the death of a parent, spouse, or child. Donor employees must complete an authorization form, and must donate leave to a specific employee. The policy restricts the amount and type of paid leave that may be surrendered, and once donated, paid leave cannot be returned to the donor employee, but will remain available to the recipient employee. If the donor and recipient employees have different pay rates, the leave time is converted based on the recipient employee’s pay rate, so that the dollar value of the surrendered leave remains the same, but leave taken by the recipient employee is always paid at the recipient employee’s rate of pay.

Under a proposed modification to the policy, eligible employees who experience “catastrophic casualty losses” (e.g., from a terrorist attack, fire, or natural disaster) could request time off. The nature of such losses would be further defined under the policy. The modification would permit employees to donate hours to a leave bank in the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster, or public health crisis that affects a large number of employees. Hours in the bank would become available to approved applicants on a first-come-first-served basis. The leave bank would be available only for a limited amount of time following the crisis event.

Under section 61, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including compensation for services. Under the general assignment of income rules, assigning someone else the right to receive compensation for personal services does not relieve the donor of tax liability on the assigned income. However, there are several exceptions to this rule, including certain employer-sponsored medical leave-sharing and major disaster leave-sharing plans.

Rev. Rul. 90-29 addresses employer-sponsored medical leave-sharing plans under which eligible employees may qualify to receive leave surrendered to the employer or leave deposited by employees in an employer-sponsored leave bank. The ruling provides that amounts paid by the employer under such a program are includable in the gross income of the recipient under section 61 as compensation for services, are considered wages for employment tax purposes (including FICA and FUTA), and income tax withholding purposes (unless otherwise excluded). Under Rev. Rul. 90-29, employees who donate leave to the employer or to an employer-sponsored leave bank do not realize income and incur no deductible expenses or loss.

Notice 2006-59 addresses employer-sponsored plans to assist employees affected by a presidentially declared major disaster. If leave is donated under such a plan, the IRS will not take the position that the leave donor realizes income or has wages or compensation with respect to the donated leave, provided the plan treats payments made by the employer to the recipient as wages for employment and income tax withholding purposes, unless otherwise excluded. Leave donors may not claim an expense, charitable contribution, or loss deduction for the donation.

In reviewing the Taxpayer’s programs, the IRS concluded that the policy currently in effect is close to that described in Rev. Rul. 90-29, and thus payments under the policy are includible in the recipient employee’s gross income under section 61, and are not includible in the donor employee’s gross income. However, the IRS concluded that the proposed modifications to the policy would take it outside of the scope of Rev. Rul. 90-29 because a recipient employee could take paid leave during a time of catastrophic loss that may or may not involve a personal or family medical emergency.

The IRS found that the modified policy is also outside the scope of a qualified employer-sponsored major disaster leave-sharing plan under Notice 2006-59 because it is not limited to aiding the victims of a “major disaster,” as declared by the President of the United States. Because the modified policy does not meet any of the exceptions under section 61, the tax consequences to donor employees would be governed by the assignment of income doctrine, resulting in the donor employee retaining the income tax liability on the assigned leave.

Although this ruling is only applicable to the taxpayer in question, employers should be mindful of the terms and parameters of their leave donation programs in order to properly withhold for employment and income taxes.

TOP  Top
 

Final ICE Regulations Describe Safe Harbor Procedures for No-Match Letters from SSA or DHS

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has amended regulations relating to the unlawful hiring or continued employment of unauthorized aliens (72 Fed. Reg. 45611). The amended regulations, which become effective September 14, 2007, describe the legal obligations of an employer regarding “no-match” letters received from the Social Security Administration (SSA). The regulations contain “safe harbor” procedures employers can follow in response to the letter, so that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will not use the letter as part of an allegation that the employer had constructive knowledge that the employee referenced in the letter was an alien not authorized to work in the U.S.

The regulations add to the definition of “knowing” to illustrate situations that may lead to a finding that the employer had constructive knowledge of the individual’s status. Examples illustrate an employer’s failure to take reasonable steps upon receiving a no-match letter from SSA or a written notice from the DHS that there is a discrepancy between employee information and information provided on Form I-9. DHS will continue to look at all relevant circumstances in determining whether an employer had constructive knowledge of an employee’s status. The safe harbor procedures include attempting to resolve the no-match, and re-verifying the employee’s identification and employment documentation through a specified process.

TOP  Top
 

Multistate Update

California to Revise Regulations on Withholding at the Source

In August, the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) held a meeting to receive comments on draft regulations on withholding tax at the source. The draft regulations address, among other topics, withholding on payments to nonresident individuals and businesses (including non-wage independent contractors, rents and royalty payments, and provisions relating to entertainers and athletes and pass-through entities). Next step: the FTB will prepare a comprehensive feedback report containing responses to all comments collected prior to and during the meeting.

Maryland No Longer Requires Income Tax Withholding on Retirement Distributions

Effective July 1, 2007, Chapter 433 (H.B. No. 776) provides income tax is not required to be withheld unless a payee specifically asks that income tax be withheld from an annuity, sick pay (as defined in section 3402(o) of the Internal Revenue Code), or retirement distribution. If the payment to a resident payee is a designated distribution that is an eligible rollover distribution, (as defined in section 3405 of the Internal Revenue Code) and the payment is subject to mandatory federal withholding, the payor must withhold three percent plus the top marginal state income tax rate for individuals.

Ohio Addresses Application of Federal Law to State Taxation of Retirement Plan Income

In a revised information release (IT 1996-01), the Ohio Department of Taxation sets out withholding guidelines for distributions from retirement plans. The guidelines address distributions from Ohio’s state retirement funds, distributions from other governmental retirement plans and from private sector “qualified” retirement plans, and the conditions that must be met in order for an employer to withhold Ohio income tax from those distributions. The guidelines also provide the requirements that must be met in order to withhold Ohio individual income tax on distributions from deferred compensation and nonqualified retirement plans.

Oregon Court Rules Corporation’s Payments to Board Members Are Wages

The Oregon Court of Appeals has affirmed an administrative law judge’s ruling that amounts paid to members of a corporation’s board of directors constitute “wages” for “employment,” and thus, are subject to state unemployment taxes. The court noted that the statute specifies that employers must pay employment taxes on all wages paid for services, and that wages constitute all remuneration for employment (services for an employer performed for remuneration or under any contract of hire). The statute enumerates several exceptions to this definition, including payments to independent contractors. Finding, however, that the legislature did not specifically exclude payments to members of a board of directors from payroll taxes, the court affirmed the earlier ruling that such payments were for services constituting employment, and are subject to payroll taxes. Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Department, 214 OR App. 385 (August 1, 2007)

Pennsylvania Changes Name and Method of Paying Emergency and Municipal Services Tax

Pennsylvanians earning $12,000 per year or more pay an annual $52 emergency and municipal services tax, which has been traditionally withheld from their paychecks in one lump sum. Act No. 7 (S.B. 218) changes the name of the tax to the “local services tax,” and, beginning in 2008, provides that the tax will be paid when the employee is paid, at a rate of $1 per week. Thus, individuals earning less than $12,000 will not have to pay the tax. In signing the bill into law, Governor Rendell noted that the Department of Community and Economic Development will work with local government associations and businesses to develop a uniform procedure for filing and processing exemption certificates for those earning less than $12,000.

TOP  Top

Contact Us

Our area leaders in the Employment Tax Practice are interested in your feedback, including any topics you might like to see addressed in future issues.

Scott Schapiro

Principal
Tysons Corner, Virginia
703-286-8267
sschapiro@kpmg.com

Michael Svoboda

Principal
Los Angeles, California
213-955-8861
mjsvoboda@kpmg.com

Subscribe to Payroll Insights

If you aren't already a subscriber, click here to send an e-mail request to us to be added to our mailing list.

 

ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY KPMG TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability to specific situations is to be determined through consultation with your tax advisor.

 
 

To unsubscribe, please click here to send a message to us with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line and hit the SEND button.

Payroll Insights, KPMG LLP, 530 Chestnut Ridge Road, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677

© 2007 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.

KPMG Online Privacy Statement and Disclaimer